|
The Usefulness of Linear Measurements to BueLingo Breeders
By Russ Danielson, Animal Science Department of North Dakota State University
[return to Past Articles]
The concept of using linear skeletal measurements to describe cattle has been a part
of the beef industry for many years. Measuring the beef cow with a tape and ruler has
occupied the time for many researchers and stockmen since frame scoring became a part
of our vocabulary in the 1960's. The American Hereford Association and the University
of Wisconsin first presented to the industry the frame score concept in 1967,
categorizing animals using their height measurement. Basically, if we knew the age of
the animal and the height of the animal we could predict the ultimate market weight of
that same animal. For a period of time, the beef cattle industry became acutely
interested in using frame score as a primary selection tool for determining breeding
programs. In some cases, this type of single trait selection without regard for
reproduction and product created problems for individual breeders. At the present time,
cattlemen are concentrating on using additional selection tools that are more useful
in their breeding programs. The underlying reason for using frame scores in selection
was that some cattle matured at a lighter weight than desirable and if cattle were fed
to a more desirable weight, they were excessively fat. Increasing the frame size of
the cattle population therefore was a way to extend the growth curve and therefore
increase the weights of cattle when they were ideally ready for slaughter. When cattle
are fed to the same fat constant end point (compositional maturity), frame size is the
major factor determining finished weight.
The following table gives the approximate live and carcass weights for steers and
heifers grading USDA choice in each frame score. The carcass weights may vary slightly
depending on the dressing percent variation. Cattle that are fatter and/or more
heavily muscled will have higher dressing percents increasing carcass weight.
|
APPROXIMATE WEIGHT AT CHOICE GRADE (lbs.) |
| FRAME |
        STEERS         |
|
      HEIFERS       |
| SCORE |
LIVE |
CARCASS |
|
LIVE |
CARCASS |
| 1 |
750 | 472 | |
600 | 378 |
| 2 |
850 | 536 | |
700 | 441 |
| 3 |
950 | 598 | |
800 | 504 |
| 4 |
1050 | 662 | |
900 | 567 |
| |
| 5 |
1150 | 724 | |
1000 | 630 |
| 6 |
1250 | 788 | |
1100 | 693 |
| 7 |
1350 | 850 | |
1200 | 756 |
| |
| 8 |
1450 | 914 | |
1300 | 819 |
| 9 |
1550 | 976 | |
1400 | 882
|
The procedure for determining frame score is relatively easy. A height measurement
of the animal is taken at a point directly over the hooks (see diagram). This
measurement is combined with the age of the animal to determine the frame score. At
any given age, a two inch change in hip height is reflected in a change in frame
score.
The Beef Improvement Federation (BIF) developed and adopted in 1978, the attached
standardized frame score system which is recognized by nearly all beef breed
associations in the United States. BIF published the following statement as an
integral part of the frame scoring report:
|
"Linear measurements are objective. They serve as supplemental information for
comprehensive performance testing. How much emphasis a breeder should place on linear
measurement information should depend on his goals relative to shape and growth
patterns, the extent to which certain shape relationships may be important to him,
and any advantage these shape relationships give them in marketing beef cattle. A
linear measurement should never be interpreted as a replacement for the weight of an
animal at a given age. Instead, measurements should be used with growth information as
a supplement for selection. No one frame size for an animal will be best for all feed
resources, breeding systems, and feed costs. Reproductive efficiency and market weight
will determine the optimum frame size with a given set of feed resources, breeding
systems and production costs."
|
The importance of the frame score system for each Buelingo breeder depends on your
need to describe cattle in your herd, either for yourself or for those you market
cattle to. There is no question that when combined with weight, the frame score of an
animal more completely describes the animal than weight alone can do. Knowing both
frame size and weight assists in estimating the fatness of an animal without actual
visual appraisal. There is a need to raise cattle that fit into specific production
systems and have those cattle produce high quality, high cutability carcasses within a
window of acceptable weights. Frame scoring can provide the basis for selection by
indicating whether emphasis to increase or decrease frame size is necessary. Breeders
should never substitute frame scores or linear measurements for reproductive
efficiency and performance testing, it should only be used as a helpful tool to
accomplish the goals that have been established by the individual breeder.
[return to Past Articles]
|